https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a19811ea1e9b3024c0f41b074d71679088bb2d7
commit r13-8478-g9a19811ea1e9b3024c0f41b074d71679088bb2d7
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
The following still helps quite a bit on its own.
diff --git a/gcc/bitmap.cc b/gcc/bitmap.cc
index 459e32c1ad1..a05ad810800 100644
--- a/gcc/bitmap.cc
+++ b/gcc/bitmap.cc
@@ -2695,18 +2695,21 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
OK, thanks for checking. Btw, -ftime-report for GCC 11 has different
bottle-necks meanwhile fixed:
tree PTA : 1.66 ( 3%)
tree SSA incremental : 31.86 ( 61%)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910
--- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
> The regression should be fixed, can you check we're now no longer slower on
> trunk? (either use a release checking build or use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 regression] |[12/13 Regression] Factor
