[Bug tree-optimization/114864] [12/13/14/15 regression] wrong code at -O1 with "-fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-fre" on x86_64-linux-gnu

2024-06-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114864 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.4|12.5 --- Comment #5 from Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/114864] [12/13/14/15 regression] wrong code at -O1 with "-fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-fre" on x86_64-linux-gnu

2024-04-26 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114864 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- Another instance is https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100453

[Bug tree-optimization/114864] [12/13/14/15 regression] wrong code at -O1 with "-fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-fre" on x86_64-linux-gnu

2024-04-26 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114864 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- Yes, this is a known issue in SRA, see PR optimization/111873, but it apparently shows up only with nonsensical combinations of switches so, well...

[Bug tree-optimization/114864] [12/13/14/15 regression] wrong code at -O1 with "-fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-fre" on x86_64-linux-gnu

2024-04-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114864 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/114864] [12/13/14/15 regression] wrong code at -O1 with "-fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-fre" on x86_64-linux-gnu

2024-04-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114864 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org Ever