[Bug tree-optimization/115224] (a ^ 1) & (a ^ ~1) is not optimized to 0 at the gimplelevel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115224 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 113072 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/115224] (a ^ 1) & (a ^ ~1) is not optimized to 0 at the gimplelevel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115224 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/115224] (a ^ 1) & (a ^ ~1) is not optimized to 0 at the gimplelevel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115224 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:547143df5aa0960fb149a26933dad7ca1c363afb commit r15-908-g547143df5aa0960fb149a26933dad7ca1c363afb Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Sun

[Bug tree-optimization/115224] (a ^ 1) & (a ^ ~1) is not optimized to 0 at the gimplelevel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115224 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug tree-optimization/115224] (a ^ 1) & (a ^ ~1) is not optimized to 0 at the gimplelevel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115224 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org