https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65dbe0ab7cdaf2aa84b09a74e594f0faacf1945c
commit r15-941-g65dbe0ab7cdaf2aa84b09a74e594f0faacf1945c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278
--- Comment #8 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks! Missed that Andrew.
> It's a low-level worker, it relies on the caller to have performed sanity
> checking on the stmt itself. I'm testing a patch doing that.
OK, no strong opinion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to avieira from comment #5)
> > I think we fixed similar bug on the read side.
>
> I don't have the best memory, but the one I can remember is PR 111882, where
> we had the SAVE_EXPR. And the the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to avieira from comment #5)
> > I think we fixed similar bug on the read side.
>
> I don't have the best memory, but the one I can remember is PR 111882, where
> we had the SAVE_EXPR. And the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] |[13/14/15 Regression]