https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116120
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116120
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c5ccdfdcab0b24afba2a661af861bec1d63f0595
commit r15-2637-gc5ccdfdcab0b24afba2a661af861bec1d63f0595
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116120
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Testing a fix, should be submitted later today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116120
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
That is:
```
v4si f3(v4si a, v4si b, v4si c, v4si d, v4si e, v4si f) {
v4si X = a == b;
v4si Y = c == d;
return ((X^Y) & (e != f)) ? {-1,...} : {0};
}
```
is what we should produce. Note this is still
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116120
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
testcase that shows the issue:
```
typedef int v4si __attribute((__vector_size__(1 * sizeof(int;
v4si f1(v4si a, v4si b, v4si c, v4si d, v4si e, v4si f) {
v4si X = a == b ? e : f;
v4si Y = c == d ? e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116120
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116120
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Summary|Wrong code fo
