https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:03299164830e19405b35a5fa862e248df4ea01e2
commit r15-4115-g03299164830e19405b35a5fa862e248df4ea01e2
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1732298d51028ae50a802e538df5d7249556255d
commit r15-4112-g1732298d51028ae50a802e538df5d7249556255d
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8157f3f2d211bfbf53fbf8dd209b47ce583f4142
commit r15-4114-g8157f3f2d211bfbf53fbf8dd209b47ce583f4142
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2abd04d01bc4e18158c785e75c91576b836f3ba6
commit r15-4113-g2abd04d01bc4e18158c785e75c91576b836f3ba6
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1048ebbbdc98a5928a974356d7f4244603b6bd32
commit r15-4110-g1048ebbbdc98a5928a974356d7f4244603b6bd32
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
--- Comment #10 from Richard Sandiford ---
I have a proof-of-concept hack (far from submission quality). But it looks
like some cases will also require us to extend aarch64_evpc_reencode to handle
SVE modes, which is also worthwhile for its own
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
This is now also the only reason gcc.dg/vect/slp-12a.c FAILs to SLP on aarch64
when SVE is enabled (riscv handles it with load-lanes for the group size of 8).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
--- Comment #7 from Richard Sandiford ---
...actually, they probably don't need to bijective. I suppose
[0, 0] for two-lane SLP is handled too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
--- Comment #6 from Richard Sandiford ---
Sorry for the slow response (here and in general). Been having to
spend my time on other things recently :(
I agree that this case is regular enough to handle for VLA, but it
seems to me like a separat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
--- Comment #5 from Ric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
So the key to notice here is the regular interleaving knows there's enough
vectors to perform two-vector to one permutes within the same group and
we only have a single child for the VEC_PERM_EXPR which for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Another example this shows is for gcc.dg/vect/slp-42.c - we definitely can
> do the interleaving scheme as non-SLP vectorization shows.
>
> gcc.dg/vect/slp-4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-20
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
16 matches
Mail list logo
