[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

2006-02-28 Thread gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #22 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-28 08:49 --- No interest in fixing for 3.4.6. -- gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

2005-10-06 Thread gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|3.4.5 |3.4.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13000

[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

2005-09-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-05 15:48 --- (In reply to comment #20) The dependency on 17652 is there because of comment #17, q.v. We want to make sure that we back out the patch to c_finish_bc_stmt when it is no longer needed, which should

[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

2005-05-19 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|3.4.4 |3.4.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13000

[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

2005-04-12 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-04-12 17:35 --- Since this bug was fixed in 4.1, I'm removing the dependencies with the 4.1 metabug. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

2005-04-12 Thread ian at airs dot com
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-04-12 18:49 --- The dependency on 17652 is there because of comment #17, q.v. We want to make sure that we back out the patch to c_finish_bc_stmt when it is no longer needed, which should happen after the tree-profiling branch is

[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

2005-01-26 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-27 01:58 --- I am uninterested in fixing this for 3.4. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|rth at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

2005-01-21 Thread ian at airs dot com
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-01-21 19:07 --- Fixed on mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Known to fail|4.0.0 3.4.0 |3.4.0

[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

2005-01-21 Thread ian at airs dot com
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-01-21 19:14 --- Note that if we do move to a better solution, i.e., building a CFG for inline functions, we should remove the patch to c_finish_bc_stmt in c-typeck.c. It prevents -Wunreachable from ever warning about an unreachable