--- Comment #26 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-29 13:18 ---
I have looked at the various test cases in this PR, and all of them work for
me.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2005-06-13 13:52 ---
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] missed jump thread
optimization on the tree-level
On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 20:41 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12
20:41 ---
Hmm, I have not seen any more, could you double check this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13875
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
05:38 ---
I don't see any more obvios ones, can you?
Though I did see a missed optimization (see PR 19431).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13875
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 17:08
---
There are some missed PHI-OPT but that is already fixed on the tcb branch.
there are some missed forward propagation opertunies though (I don't know if they are
fixed on the tcb
or not).
--
