https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15255
Bug 15255 depends on bug 15459, which changed state.
Bug 15459 Summary: [meta-bug] there should be a tree combiner like the rtl one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15459
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-13 08:58
---
Subject: Bug 15255
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Aug 13 08:57:20 2008
New Revision: 139048
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=139048
Log:
2008-08-13 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-13 09:00
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-29 14:17 ---
We already handle most of the foldings in fold_plusminus_mult_expr, just the
A + A - 2 * A folding is not done (for a reason).
We also miss (A + A) * Cst - A * 2 * Cst, which is what I am going to
implement
in
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-29 16:00 ---
Subject: Bug 15255
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 29 15:59:43 2008
New Revision: 134798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=134798
Log:
2008-04-29 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-29 16:03
---
The fold missed optimizations are fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15255
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-28 20:19 ---
Mine.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-15
22:22 ---
As I said before I was not going to fix a fold problem (for the first testcase).
--
What|Removed |Added
