--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11
02:25 ---
Re-opening. A re-organization of the tree optimizers is causing us to
misdiagnose this test case once again. I am going to work on a better warning
implementation that doesn't get confused so easily.
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-17
22:21 ---
Fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg01314.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-16
20:42 ---
This is not really fixable.
Analysis: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-12/msg00681.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-05
04:04 ---
It has never worked on the tree-ssa branch.
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC target
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-15
13:50 ---
Confirmed, CCP is removing the use of the uninitialized variable.
--
What|Removed |Added
