--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2004-12-06 20:23
---
Just checked in a patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06
20:22 ---
Subject: Bug 18601
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-06 20:22:02
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-cfg.c tree-flow.h
Lo
--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-25
01:02 ---
Patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg02089.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-22
16:45 ---
The code in this testcase looks basically this way:
c:
switch (b)
{
case 1:
b = 2; goto c;
case 2:
b = 3; goto c;
...
}
What happens is that dom peforms jump threading over the
--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2004-11-22 14:38
---
A better way than my comment #3 would be to call free_dominance_info
when the worklist in thread_jumps is nonempty (or contains more elements
than some threshold as Andrew Pinski has suggested).
--
http:/
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-22
06:39 ---
Zdenek since you added the code to thread_jumps to incremental update the DOM
information, could
you comment on this bug?
(Note I have seen this in more than just this testcase which is superficial).
I a
