--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23
11:22 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01387.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--
Bug 20100 depends on bug 20115, which changed state.
Bug 20115 Summary: [4.0 Regression] Pure functions are mishandled
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20115
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23
22:20 ---
Subject: Bug 20100
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-23 22:20:49
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23
05:08 ---
Subject: Bug 20100
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-23 05:08:33
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-optimize.c
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-20 18:50
---
I'm unassigning this PR to avoid giving an impression that I'm about to solve
it. (I might be, but I have to read up on tree-ssa first.)
I'd be happy if someone else fixed it, as long as my test-case is
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-20
19:02 ---
One more note, we do the correct thing with --param global-var-threshold=0
so this shows that we
have aliasing issue. Diego, why don't we create the .GLOBAL_VAR otherwise?
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-20
23:07 ---
PR 20115 shows it is bigger deal than just LIM and that pure function handling
is just broken.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW
