--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20470
--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-28 21:31
---
patch committed
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-25
20:10 ---
Subject: Bug 20470
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-25 20:10:39
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/t
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-25
20:08 ---
Subject: Bug 20470
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-25 20:08:33
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog fold-const.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com 2005-03-15
18:22 ---
Ditto here, except added additional call to negate_expr_p(arg2) to make sure it
was ok to flip the expression back to it's original form. Not sure if that was
necessary, was assuming I'd get comments when I
--- Additional Comments From pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com 2005-03-14
22:29 ---
Decided to look into this myself, currently testing a patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20470
--- Additional Comments From pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com 2005-03-14
19:13 ---
I noticed this in the twolf benchmark of SPEC, dimbox.c:new_dbox_a().
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20470
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-14
17:13 ---
I will note I know there is an Apple radar about this bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20470
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-14
17:12 ---
Confirmed, I know where this comes from too, SPEC (but I had forgot which test).
--
What|Removed |Added
--
