--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-06
16:54 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg00796.html was the start of the
discussion
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21407
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-05
23:07 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Fixed
Have the URL for the aliasing discussion?
Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21407
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-06
00:16 ---
It's in the ml archives, i'll try to find it.
Basically, Mark and friends believe that in C, it's legal to add or subtract
some bytes from a pointer to a field of a structure and have a valid pointer to
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 12:16:20AM -, dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-06
00:16 ---
It's in the ml archives, i'll try to find it.
Thanks. I remember the discussion, but I need some URL so that
we can
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-07-06 00:23
---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] wrong code with downcast in C++
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 12:16:20AM -, dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-06 00:42 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] wrong code with downcast in C++
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Nathan queried the C++ committee, and they actually *don't* think
| it's
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-06
00:58 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] wrong code with
downcast in C++
| Nathan queried the C++ committee, and they actually *don't* think
| it's legal in C++,
It is more accurate to say that Nathan
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-06 01:16 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] wrong code with downcast in C++
dberlin at dberlin dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] wrong code with
| downcast in C++
|
|
| |
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18
13:27 ---
Subject: Bug 21407
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-18 13:26:20
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-ssa-operands.c
Added
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18
13:28 ---
Fixed
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-05-10
16:01 ---
In fact, the salias dump for the C++ testcase says:
---
;; Function void bar() (_Z3barv)
structure field tag SFT.2 created for var sb offset 0
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
16:07 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] wrong code with
downcast in C++
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 16:01 +, giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote:
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot
12 matches
Mail list logo
