[Bug tree-optimization/21636] Missed ccp optimization

2008-04-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-30 19:06 --- Subject: Bug 21636 Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 30 19:05:12 2008 New Revision: 134834 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=134834 Log: 2008-04-30 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug tree-optimization/21636] Missed ccp optimization

2008-04-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-30 19:08 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/21636] Missed ccp optimization

2008-03-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-26 23:43 --- Mine. I am in fix-CCP mood lately. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/21636] Missed ccp optimization

2005-09-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-07 04:46 --- Actually there needs some improvements to ccp_fold to do this fully. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/21636] Missed ccp optimization

2005-08-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-29 05:18 --- I am wrong, in saying that if fold does it, we will automatic get the optimization but after fold doing the simplification, I think this turns into the same issue as PR 23588. -- What

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/21636] Missed ccp optimization

2005-08-28 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Aug 29, 2005, at 1:18 AM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-29 05:18 --- I am wrong, in saying that if fold does it, we will automatic get the optimization but after fold doing the simplification, I think

[Bug tree-optimization/21636] Missed ccp optimization

2005-08-28 Thread pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-29 05:19 --- Subject: Re: Missed ccp optimization On Aug 29, 2005, at 1:18 AM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-29 05:18 ---

[Bug tree-optimization/21636] Missed ccp optimization

2005-05-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-27 17:24 --- If we get fold to do the work, I think ccp will do the rest for us. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/21636] Missed ccp optimization

2005-05-18 Thread kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
-- What|Removed |Added CC||kazu at cs dot umass dot edu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21636

[Bug tree-optimization/21636] Missed ccp optimization

2005-05-18 Thread kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2005-05-18 20:56 --- Confirmed. Here is what I get from the first CCP. int g() () { int * i; struct f * a1; struct f a; int D.1687; bb 0: a.i = 1; a1_3 = a; i_4 = a.i; D.1687_5 = *i_4; D.1687_6 = D.1687_5;