[Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails

2008-02-07 Thread ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-07 18:33 --- This test is still XPASS'ing everywhere on 4.1, may I backport this? 2005-11-30 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR tree-optimization/21655 * g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C: Remove XFAIL. Recent res

[Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails

2008-02-13 Thread ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 17:05 --- Subject: Bug 21655 Author: ghazi Date: Wed Feb 13 17:04:46 2008 New Revision: 132289 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132289 Log: Backport: 2005-11-30 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL

[Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails

2005-05-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 21:13 --- No just the testcase is failing, the problem described in PR 14814 is still fixed. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails

2005-05-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-21 14:03 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails

2005-10-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-10 04:54 --- This has been xfailed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Ke

[Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails

2005-11-22 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-22 15:39 --- This test has changed from XFAIL to XPASS for me on i686-pc-linux-gnu between 20051120 (I don't have the exact revision number; the datestamp implies 107240 or later) and 20051122 (revision 107356). gcc-testresults sh

[Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails

2005-11-22 Thread law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 from law at redhat dot com 2005-11-22 19:18 --- Subject: Re: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 15:39 +, jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > --- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-22

[Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails

2005-11-22 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-22 19:46 --- FWIW, I can help narrowing the range of revisions: XFAILed for cris-*-* and mmix-knuth-mmixware with "Mon Nov 21 03:58:26 UTC 2005 (revision 107276M)", XPASSing since "Tue Nov 22 00:42:24 UTC 2005 (revision 107345M)". -

[Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails

2005-11-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 21:07 --- Subject: Bug 21655 Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 30 21:07:10 2005 New Revision: 107739 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107739 Log: 2005-11-30 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR

[Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails

2005-11-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 21:09 --- Fixed in 4.2. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NE