[Bug tree-optimization/21998] (cond ? result1 : result2) is vectorized, where equivalent if-syntax isn't (store)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21998 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- We can vectorize test2 using mask stores

[Bug tree-optimization/21998] (cond ? result1 : result2) is vectorized, where equivalent if-syntax isn't (store)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21998 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-27 11:32:19 UTC --- Note that the concern is also that a1 may be mapped to a read-only segment, so introducing a store data-race may trap. That's probably out of the C99

[Bug tree-optimization/21998] (cond ? result1 : result2) is vectorized, where equivalent if-syntax isn't (store)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21998 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||53947 ---

[Bug tree-optimization/21998] (cond ? result1 : result2) is vectorized, where equivalent if-syntax isn't (store)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21998 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/21998] (cond ? result1 : result2) is vectorized, where equivalent if-syntax isn't (store)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21998 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-13 11:28:45 UTC --- We have two related flags here, -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores, and --param allow-store-data-races. We can adjust the former to honor the latter if

[Bug tree-optimization/21998] (cond ? result1 : result2) is vectorized, where equivalent if-syntax isn't (store)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:24 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW