--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-18
14:44 ---
*** Bug 23945 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From marcus at jet dot franken dot de 2005-09-20
14:48 ---
any progress here?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22438
--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-20
14:49 ---
I have pinged the patch today.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22438
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-20
14:50 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> any progress here?
The patch was just pinged today:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-09/msg01239.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22438
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-22
11:24 ---
Subject: Bug 22438
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-22 11:24:01
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
Lo
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-22
15:25 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12
12:10 ---
The problem is actually completely unrelated to PR 21963; I am working on it.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Target Milestone|---
--- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
2005-07-20 14:46 ---
// even smaller testcase, compile with -O1:
int foo (char k)
{
int i = 0, j;
for (j = 0; j < 10; j++)
i += k;
return i;
}
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
2005-07-20 15:26 ---
setting severety to 'critical' because fails almost everywhere with -O1
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
2005-09-10 13:03 ---
*** Bug 22516 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--
11 matches
Mail list logo