--- Comment #4 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 13:39 ---
Nevertheless, the fact that boolean_true_node has overflow flag set is wrong,
this should not happen -- shared constants should not be modified.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24599
--- Comment #5 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 14:02 ---
This happens in c-typeck.c:build_c_cast:
value = convert (type, value);
/* Ignore any integer overflow caused by the cast. */
if (TREE_CODE (value) == INTEGER_CST)
{
/* If
--- Comment #2 from dje at transmeta dot com 2005-11-03 18:18 ---
I'm not sure the root cause of this bug is fixed in 4.1. It looks to me like
it's still there and is only (currently) hidden. Am I mistaken?
Apply this patch to gcc-4.1-20051029 and recompile the testcase with -O3.
I'm
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 18:25 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I'm not sure the root cause of this bug is fixed in 4.1. It looks to me like
it's still there and is only (currently) hidden. Am I mistaken?
Apply this patch to gcc-4.1-20051029 and
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24599
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 20:09 ---
Confirmed, only a 4.0 regression. Back trace:
#0 0x004a1ff2 in find_interesting_uses_cond (data=0x7fc1d340,
stmt=0x2afc0320,
cond_p=0x2afc0358) at
