--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-02 17:12 ---
Actually this is invalid and GCC is correct to do what it is doing. Quote from
the docs:
A return of 0 does not indicate that the value is not a constant, but merely
that GCC cannot prove it is a constant with the s
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-02 15:40 ---
Seems to happen with current 4.1 and mainline, too. But I'm wrong in that this
is not a regression. Seems this warning hack was introduced after our switch
to 4.1.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
