------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-08 20:58 ------- SMT.18091 is only ever mentioned in RVUSE_IN/OUT, not for any value handle, D.571521_46 also doesn't have a value handle.
Created value VH.4677 for fieldEngineBase_5 Created value VH.4679 for *VH.4677 vuses: (SMT.18080_30) Created value VH.4710 for data_m Created value VH.4711 for VH.4679.VH.4710 vuses: (SMT.18080_30) Created value VH.4712 for blockControllerPtr_m Created value VH.4713 for VH.4711.VH.4712 vuses: (SMT.18080_30) Created value VH.4714 for ptr_m Created value VH.4715 for VH.4713.VH.4714 vuses: (SMT.18080_30) Created value VH.4716 for *VH.4715 vuses: (SMT.18083_148) Created value VH.4717 for pBegin_m Created value VH.4718 for VH.4716.VH.4717 vuses: (SMT.18083_148) Found partial redundancy for expression VH.4716.VH.4717 (VH.4718) NOTE: no flow-sensitive alias info for pretmp.18109_51 in pretmp.18111_48 = pretmp.18109_51->pBegin_m; NOTE: no flow-sensitive alias info for pretmp.18109_51 in pretmp.18111_48 = pretmp.18109_51->pBegin_m; Inserted pretmp.18111_48 = pretmp.18109_51->pBegin_m in predecessor 23 why's that SMT.18083 (if not 18091) not added to the stmt? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|PRE loses SMT alias info |PRE looses SMT alias info http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27086