[Bug tree-optimization/27768] [4.2 regression] wrong-code with vectors

2006-05-25 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 08:30 --- Btw, this is on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27768

[Bug tree-optimization/27768] [4.2 regression] wrong-code with vectors

2006-05-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug tree-optimization/27768] [4.2 regression] wrong-code with vectors

2006-05-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 20:47 --- Something is removing the store to _M_start. this_252 = (struct _Vector_base > *) &b; this_253 = this_252; # VUSE ; D.13530_256 = this_252->_M_impl._M_start; I think the cast there is causing the problem

[Bug tree-optimization/27768] [4.2 regression] wrong-code with vectors

2006-05-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 20:50 --- This is related to PR 19817, the C++ front-end is producing that construct which causes us not to constant prop zero. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27768

[Bug tree-optimization/27768] [4.2 regression] wrong-code with vectors

2006-05-30 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-30 16:05 --- I think there's something hosed with aliasing. The code crashes with -O2, but runs fine with -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing. -- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed