[Bug tree-optimization/27937] [4.2 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/x86

2006-08-04 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 21:36 --- > A mainline bootstrap as of 20060724 was successful, so it seems so > (although I haven't seen a specific fix addressing this issue). This is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-07/msg00229.html and I asked

[Bug tree-optimization/27937] [4.2 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/x86

2006-07-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-28 16:21 --- Fixed so closing as such. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/27937] [4.2 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/x86

2006-07-28 Thread ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
--- Comment #12 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-07-28 16:03 --- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/x86 rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org writes: > Is this now fixed on the mainline? A mainline bootstrap as of 20060724 was successful, so i

[Bug tree-optimization/27937] [4.2 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/x86

2006-07-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-24 08:33 --- Is this now fixed on the mainline? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27937

[Bug tree-optimization/27937] [4.2 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/x86

2006-07-05 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-05 17:57 --- Ada is not release-critical. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/27937] [4.2 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/x86

2006-06-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 10:58 --- Is there a testcase for this bug that can be examined on more common host/target systems? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27937