[Bug tree-optimization/29156] [4.2 Regression] Misscompilation due to struct alias

2006-09-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-21 04:06 --- Note in 4.1.2, we have two different TMT's here for the variables. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29156

[Bug tree-optimization/29156] [4.2 Regression] Misscompilation due to struct alias

2006-09-20 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29156

[Bug tree-optimization/29156] [4.2 Regression] Misscompilation due to struct alias

2006-09-20 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-21 02:32 --- So, actually, i'm pretty sure they should have the same SMT, because they should be in the same alias set. Why do they get different SMT's? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29156

[Bug tree-optimization/29156] [4.2 Regression] Misscompilation due to struct alias

2006-09-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-20 22:26 --- Confirmed, a regression. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/29156] [4.2 Regression] Misscompilation due to struct alias

2006-09-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias Known to fail||4.2.0 Kno