[Bug tree-optimization/29254] [4.2 Regression] verify_cgraph_node failed (inlined_to pointer is set but no predecessors found)

2006-10-04 Thread lopezibanez at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-10-04 20:21 --- Don't know whether it is relevant, but no ICE occurs if Werror is not used. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29254

[Bug tree-optimization/29254] [4.2 Regression] verify_cgraph_node failed (inlined_to pointer is set but no predecessors found)

2006-10-01 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29254

[Bug tree-optimization/29254] [4.2 Regression] verify_cgraph_node failed (inlined_to pointer is set but no predecessors found)

2006-09-28 Thread lopezibanez at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-09-29 00:53 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Not so surprising if you check gcc/c-typeck.c line 3980. The warning is not > conditionalised to any option. What is the criteria for a warning to be > emitted > always or be conditional to

[Bug tree-optimization/29254] [4.2 Regression] verify_cgraph_node failed (inlined_to pointer is set but no predecessors found)

2006-09-28 Thread lopezibanez at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-09-29 00:37 --- Not so surprising if you check gcc/c-typeck.c line 3980. The warning is not conditionalised to any option. What is the criteria for a warning to be emitted always or be conditional to a given option? -- http://gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/29254] [4.2 Regression] verify_cgraph_node failed (inlined_to pointer is set but no predecessors found)

2006-09-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-28 10:55 --- Confirmed. The warning is correct - we emit it with explicit casts, too. But surprisingly -Wno-cast-qual does not get rid of it. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/29254] [4.2 Regression] verify_cgraph_node failed (inlined_to pointer is set but no predecessors found)

2006-09-27 Thread lopezibanez at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-09-27 21:31 --- Is this testcase better? list_compare (int * list1) { if (list1) value_compare (); } func1 (int * f){} value_compare (int * a) { if (a) list_compare (a); } func2 (const in

[Bug tree-optimization/29254] [4.2 Regression] verify_cgraph_node failed (inlined_to pointer is set but no predecessors found)

2006-09-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-27 18:34 --- Here is a reduced testcase: typedef struct _GList GList; typedef struct _KvpFrame KvpFrame; typedef struct _KvpValue KvpValue; struct _KvpValue { int type; GList *list; }; kvp_glist_compare (GList * list1,GList *

[Bug tree-optimization/29254] [4.2 Regression] verify_cgraph_node failed (inlined_to pointer is set but no predecessors found)

2006-09-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug tree-optimization/29254] [4.2 Regression] verify_cgraph_node failed (inlined_to pointer is set but no predecessors found)

2006-09-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot |