--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-19 16:16 ---
Subject: Bug 29753
Author: rguenth
Date: Sun Nov 19 16:15:47 2006
New Revision: 118990
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118990
Log:
2006-11-19 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ba
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-19 16:15 ---
Subject: Bug 29753
Author: rguenth
Date: Sun Nov 19 16:14:49 2006
New Revision: 118989
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118989
Log:
2006-11-19 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ba
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-15 08:07 ---
Subject: Bug 29753
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 15 08:07:03 2006
New Revision: 118845
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118845
Log:
2006-11-15 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR mi
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-12 21:33
---
This is a tricky case, since the underlying memory pointed to by the pointer is
non-volatile. In other words, the compiler knows that "s" is non volatile,
even though the pointer type is "volatile int *".
The C99
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-11-07 17:25 ---
confirmed, untested patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-11/msg00184.html
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
