--- Comment #11 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-14 10:00 ---
Is this still a problem?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30088
--- Comment #12 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-14 17:51 ---
The submitter's testcase fails on powerpc-linux with the current 4.1 and 4.2
branches but has passed on mainline for several months. In comment #9 I said
that results seemed to be intermittent; if it would be
--- Comment #13 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-14 18:35 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
The submitter's testcase fails on powerpc-linux with the current 4.1 and 4.2
branches but has passed on mainline for several months. In comment #9 I said
that results seemed to be
--- Comment #9 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-25 01:11 ---
The test also fails on powerpc-linux, so it's not specific to i686-linux. The
results seem to be inconsistent, so I'm doing more testing to determine whether
the failure is intermittent.
--
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-25 01:16
---
This is most likely related to PR 30567.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30088
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 12:17 ---
Slightly reduced testcase:
#include cassert
#include string
struct A
{
A() : _x(0.0), _y(0.0) { }
float f(const int i) { return (i == 0 ? _x : _y); }
float _x, _y;
};
A h(const char* s)
{
A a;
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 12:30 ---
We have (alias1):
Type memory tags
TMT.89, UID 17988, struct
basic_stringchar,std::char_traitschar,std::allocatorchar , is an alias
tag, is addressable, is global, call clobbered
...
TMT.95, UID 17994, float, is
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 14:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=13008)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13008action=view)
reduced testcase
This is a reduced testcase (still requires libstdc++ at link time) where you
can see the wrong
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 14:10 ---
4.1.0 works, so this is a regression on the branch. Janis, can you hunt what
broke it?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 14:52 ---
Actually the original testcase also fails with 4.1.0.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30088
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Unexpected compilation |[4.1 Regression] Unexpected
|results: -O1 vs. -O1
13 matches
Mail list logo
