--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-05 20:25
---
I have a fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de 2007-07-05 18:29 ---
Subject: Re: Fails to tree-combine conditions
in COND_EXPRs
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, pluto at agmk dot net wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #9 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-07-05 18:21 ---
> (In reply to comment #8)
>
--- Comment #9 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-07-05 18:21 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> This is related to the gimplifier verifying call expression types to disable
> inlining. In this case the argument type list says we need struct _Bind, but
> the actual argument is struct _Bind*.
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-05 17:51 ---
This is related to the gimplifier verifying call expression types to disable
inlining. In this case the argument type list says we need struct _Bind, but
the actual argument is struct _Bind*. Oh well.
--
http:
--- Comment #7 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-07-05 17:35 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Fixed.
Richard, there's a recent regresion in 4.3/r126266:
_ZSt9transformIPlS0_NSt3tr15_BindIFSt4plusIlEllT0_T_S8_S7_T1_:
cmpq%rsi, %rdi
je .L2
addq$8, %rd
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-27 14:56 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRM
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-27 14:44 ---
Subject: Bug 30965
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Apr 27 14:43:42 2007
New Revision: 124217
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124217
Log:
2007-04-27 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 12:57 ---
I need to update it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
--- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-04-14 11:00 ---
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00129.html
should this one be pinged ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-03-16 19:38 ---
just to keep track, patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00129.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-02 20:04 ---
*** Bug 31029 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
12 matches
Mail list logo