--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-24 04:07 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-06-21 21:05 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Author: spop
> Date: Wed Jun 20 23:42:28 2007
> New Revision: 125900
This commit causes PR32457.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 23:45 ---
Subject: Bug 32075
Author: spop
Date: Wed Jun 20 23:44:56 2007
New Revision: 125901
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=125901
Log:
PR tree-optimization/32075
* tree-data-ref.c (subsc
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 23:42 ---
Subject: Bug 32075
Author: spop
Date: Wed Jun 20 23:42:28 2007
New Revision: 125900
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=125900
Log:
PR tree-optimization/32075
* tree-data-ref.c (subsc
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 16:57 ---
Subject: Re: can't determine dependence between p->a[x+i] and p->a[x+i+1]
where x is invariant but defined in the function
The problem has been introduced in version 124927.
@@ -3182,7 +3182,7 @@ access_functions_are
--- Comment #2 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2007-06-18 11:03 ---
I see this in the vectorizer dump file (with mainline from a few days ago):
(compute_affine_dependence
(stmt_a =
D.3027_19 = p_7->a[D.3026_18])
(stmt_b =
p_7->a[D.3025_17] = D.3027_19)
Data ref a:
(Data Ref:
stmt
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-25 02:05 ---
Ok, I have a patch for this issue, I am going to test it with -ftree-vectorize
-msse2 while bootstrapping too to make sure that we don't have really any
regression due to data reference going wrong (the previous patc
