--- Comment #15 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-23 09:44 ---
Subject: Bug 32772
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Sep 23 09:44:23 2007
New Revision: 128688
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128688
Log:
PR tree-optimization/32772
* gcc.c-torture/compi
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-07 00:17
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENE
--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 08:22 ---
The testcases got fixed already by the
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127491
commit, which is why Daniel wrote
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32772#c11
Guess checking in the testcase is
--- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 06:48 ---
Which testcase is not fixed?
./xgcc -B ./ -Wall -Wundef -m32 -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Werror-implicit-function-declaration
-Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Os -msoft-
--- Comment #11 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-23 13:45
---
It did not fail for me at the point i committed the patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32772
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-23 12:43
---
The testcase is not fixed and you didn't add a testcase.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #9 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-20 01:54 ---
All should be fixed
--
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Sta
--- Comment #8 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-19 23:23 ---
Subject: Bug 32772
Author: dberlin
Date: Sun Aug 19 23:23:29 2007
New Revision: 127629
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127629
Log:
2007-08-19 Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix P
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32772
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-04 12:06 ---
I think this is exactly the same as PR 32032, the inliner not setting
has_volatile_ops correctly.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 14:03 ---
Even shorter testcase:
struct S
{
unsigned long bits[1];
};
void f1 (int, unsigned long *);
int f2 (void);
int f3 (int, unsigned long *);
int f4 (int, unsigned long *);
static inline __attribute__ ((always_inline)
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 10:17 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 10:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=13919)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13919&action=view)
reduced testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32772
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 10:04 ---
-Os is enough to trigger the problem on x86_64. (with or without -m32)
Reducing.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
Keywords||ice
15 matches
Mail list logo
