--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-11 05:45 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 19:20 ---
Subject: Bug 32824
Author: spop
Date: Tue Apr 6 19:19:41 2010
New Revision: 158018
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=158018
Log:
Fix PR32824.
2010-04-06 Changpeng Fang changpeng.f...@amd.com
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-17 17:58 ---
Patch by Changpeng, which has been approved for 4.6 Stage 1 and moves the
pass_lim up;
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg00775.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32824
--- Comment #8 from changpeng dot fang at amd dot com 2010-03-17 21:22
---
Created an attachment (id=20133)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20133action=view)
patch with the testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32824
--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-26 13:20 ---
*** Bug 43184 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 20:47 ---
Additional testcases:
(1) see loop in lines 23 and 32 in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2007-08/msg00171.html
(2)
SUBROUTINE SUSCEP(L,Iz)
IMPLICIT NONE
INTEGER L , Iz(L,L) , iznum, ix, iy
--- Comment #4 from dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 08:59 ---
Just for the record - as we discussed last week, there are two ways to solve
this problem - either have LIM leave behind it cleaner code (smthing like
copy-prop + dce to eliminate the extra copy stmts), or improve the
--- Comment #1 from dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-19 18:09 ---
I think this is similar to PR19347?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32824
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-19 18:14 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I think this is similar to PR19347?
It is not because LIM does its work, IR right before the vectorizer:
bb 3:
# ivtmp.31_17 = PHI ivtmp.31_18(4), 1600(2)
# e_lsm.30_1 = PHI
--- Comment #3 from dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-19 18:28 ---
ah, I misunderstood you - when you wrote before that you manually LIM'd e I
assumed it was because LIM didn't work. I see that the problem is with the
garbage that LIM leaves behind:
pr32824.c:6: note: Analyze phi:
10 matches
Mail list logo
