[Bug tree-optimization/33593] tree-outof-ssa moves sources of non-call exceptions past sequence points

2008-02-03 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-03 14:35 --- Should be fixed on the trunk. -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/33593] tree-outof-ssa moves sources of non-call exceptions past sequence points

2007-09-30 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-30 16:00 --- Subject: Bug 33593 Author: dnovillo Date: Sun Sep 30 16:00:36 2007 New Revision: 128893 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=128893 Log: PR 33593 * tree-ssa-ter.c

[Bug tree-optimization/33593] tree-outof-ssa moves sources of non-call exceptions past sequence points

2007-09-29 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 19:05 --- Assigning to Diego as he already has a patch (thanks!) -- rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/33593] tree-outof-ssa moves sources of non-call exceptions past sequence points

2007-09-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 19:05 --- 1 / 0; that does not aways trap. on ppc an undefined value is returned. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33593

[Bug tree-optimization/33593] tree-outof-ssa moves sources of non-call exceptions past sequence points

2007-09-29 Thread dnovillo at google dot com
--- Comment #3 from dnovillo at google dot com 2007-09-29 19:08 --- Subject: Re: tree-outof-ssa moves sources of non-call exceptions past sequence points On 29 Sep 2007 19:05:20 -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1 / 0; that does not aways trap. on ppc

[Bug tree-optimization/33593] tree-outof-ssa moves sources of non-call exceptions past sequence points

2007-09-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 19:08 --- I think 1/0 should not be marked as throwing though as it is target dependent if it actually will trap or not. In fact as I mentioned on PPC, it does not trap. --