[Bug tree-optimization/34029] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed

2008-01-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-04 15:59 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug tree-optimization/34029] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed

2008-01-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-04 15:57 --- Subject: Bug 34029 Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jan 4 15:56:41 2008 New Revision: 131325 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131325 Log: 2008-01-04 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug tree-optimization/34029] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed

2008-01-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-04 13:33 --- Which also means this is a checking-only ICE. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/34029] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed

2008-01-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-04 13:32 --- Mine. We'll stop the verifier from complaining. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/34029] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed

2008-01-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 16:23 --- I don't have time to work on this any more. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/34029] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed

2008-01-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 16:23 --- I will test the following bool is_gimple_min_invariant (const_tree t) { switch (TREE_CODE (t)) { case ADDR_EXPR: /* We do not allow arbitrary invariant expressions as gimple such as &a[1 - &

[Bug tree-optimization/34029] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed

2007-11-27 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34029

[Bug tree-optimization/34029] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed

2007-11-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-20 11:50 --- While it would be nice if that got folded, I believe the problem is elsewhere. Consider: static const char s[] = "ab.cd.efghijk"; static const char t[] = "abcde"; long foo (const char *x) { const char *a; long b =

[Bug tree-optimization/34029] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed

2007-11-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-10 22:26 --- D.1533_20 = (long unsigned int) &s[6 - () &s]; should really folded to just 6. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34029

[Bug tree-optimization/34029] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed

2007-11-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-10 22:25 --- Hmm: D.1532_19: [&s[6 - () &s], &s[6 - () &s]] I think this my fault with respect of pointer plus merge. taking over. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/34029] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed

2007-11-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-08 20:27 --- Slightly reduced: static const char s[] = "ab.cd.efghijk"; int foo (const char *x) { const char *a; int b = 0; a = __builtin_strchr (s, '.'); if (a == 0) b = 1; else if ((a = __builtin_strchr (a + 1, '.

[Bug tree-optimization/34029] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed

2007-11-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |