[Bug tree-optimization/36631] [4.3/4.4 Regression] attribute always_inline - sorry, unimplemented: recursive inlining

2008-08-27 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-27 22:04 --- 4.3.2 is released, changing milestones to 4.3.3. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/36631] [4.3/4.4 Regression] attribute always_inline - sorry, unimplemented: recursive inlining

2008-08-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 15:25 --- Mine. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/36631] [4.3/4.4 Regression] attribute always_inline - sorry, unimplemented: recursive inlining

2008-07-31 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-31 14:44 --- Richard, there is one problem that is yours. We conclude that call is uninlinable due to type missmatch. This should not happen on C++. This gets misdiagnozed as originally recursive inlning was only reason why

[Bug tree-optimization/36631] [4.3/4.4 Regression] attribute always_inline - sorry, unimplemented: recursive inlining

2008-07-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-10 14:23 --- Confirmed. Honza, can you have a look here? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added