--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-06 11:14 ---
For cris-axis-elf we do not fold
one_1 = 1.0e+0;
oneL_2 = 1.0e+0;
__builtin_sincos (1.0e+0, s, c);
to a constant because __builtin_sincos did not get transformed to
__builtin_cexpi.
We fold it later via the
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-06 11:00 ---
Ok, I can see at least one missed CCP optimization when looking at what
the x86_64 target produces. Now building a cross to see why for cris the
second CCP pass together with either FRE or DOM or the third CCP pass
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-06 14:16 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-06 14:16 ---
Subject: Bug 39643
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 6 14:16:15 2009
New Revision: 145604
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=145604
Log:
2009-04-06 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #1 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-04-05 18:07 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.5 Regression]: cris-elf
gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-3.c -O1 and -Os sincos one
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, hp at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
With revision 145488 this test passed.
From revision 145495
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-05 22:00 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Can you 1) reduce the testcase and attach preprocessed source that
works with a cross-compiler,
The test-case was already self-contained and had little context-sensitiveness
due to the
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-05 22:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=17591)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17591action=view)
Reduced gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-3.c
The two lines causing link_error() to be called as in the linker error
