[Bug tree-optimization/41491] [4.5 regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:386

2009-12-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41491

[Bug tree-optimization/41491] [4.5 regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:386

2009-12-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 16:17 --- I can reproduce it with a x86_64 -> arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi cross, so I'll look into this. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/41491] [4.5 regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:386

2009-12-01 Thread rmansfield at qnx dot com
--- Comment #11 from rmansfield at qnx dot com 2009-12-01 15:16 --- I can still reproduce it using a arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi target. 20091201 (experimental) [trunk revision 154872]) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41491

[Bug tree-optimization/41491] [4.5 regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:386

2009-12-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 12:23 --- A cross to spu-elf from x86_64 doesn't ICE. Can someone re-confirm that the bug is still happening? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --