[Bug tree-optimization/43657] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] -ftree-loop-linear causes FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-5.c execution test

2011-02-02 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43657 --- Comment #11 from Diego Novillo 2011-02-02 17:48:23 UTC --- Author: dnovillo Date: Wed Feb 2 17:48:17 2011 New Revision: 169593 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169593 Log: Add testcase for PR43657. 2011-01-18 Sebastia

[Bug tree-optimization/43657] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] -ftree-loop-linear causes FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-5.c execution test

2011-01-16 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43657 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/43657] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] -ftree-loop-linear causes FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-5.c execution test

2011-01-16 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43657 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-16 12:29:18 UTC --- Created attachment 22982 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22982 Proposed patch This avoids the transformation, but... Is the test too strict? My reasoning is th

[Bug tree-optimization/43657] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] -ftree-loop-linear causes FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-5.c execution test

2011-01-18 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43657 --- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop 2011-01-18 20:54:38 UTC --- Author: spop Date: Tue Jan 18 20:54:34 2011 New Revision: 168964 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168964 Log: Add testcase for PR43657. 2011-01-18 Sebastian Pop

[Bug tree-optimization/43657] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] -ftree-loop-linear causes FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-5.c execution test

2011-01-18 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43657 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |spop at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/43657] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] -ftree-loop-linear causes FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-5.c execution test

2011-01-25 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43657 --- Comment #9 from Sebastian Pop 2011-01-25 21:25:05 UTC --- Author: spop Date: Tue Jan 25 21:24:53 2011 New Revision: 169254 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169254 Log: Add testcase for PR43657. 2011-01-18 Sebastian Pop

[Bug tree-optimization/43657] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] -ftree-loop-linear causes FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-5.c execution test

2011-01-25 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43657 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/43657] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] -ftree-loop-linear causes FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-5.c execution test

2010-10-19 Thread changpeng.fang at amd dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43657 --- Comment #4 from Changpeng Fang 2010-10-19 21:27:46 UTC --- for (k = 0; k < 32; k++) { res = 0; for (j = 0; j < 32; j++) for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) { next = a[i][j]; res = c > cond_ar

[Bug tree-optimization/43657] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] -ftree-loop-linear causes FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-5.c execution test

2010-04-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43657

[Bug tree-optimization/43657] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] -ftree-loop-linear causes FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-5.c execution test

2010-05-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:13 --- GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/43657] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] -ftree-loop-linear causes FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-5.c execution test

2010-05-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-26 11:15 --- Created an attachment (id=20748) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20748&action=view) pr43657.c Slightly adjusted testcase. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43657