[Bug tree-optimization/43924] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

2010-06-17 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #14 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-06-17 12:30 --- >From comments #11 to #13, given links and http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg01744.html closing as fixed. -- dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed: What|Removed |Add

[Bug tree-optimization/43924] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

2010-06-16 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-17 05:08 --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > Disappeared for cris-elf in (160828:r160836], which agrees i686-linux > > results > > on gcc100 at

[Bug tree-optimization/43924] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

2010-06-16 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-17 04:43 --- (In reply to comment #11) > Disappeared for cris-elf in (160828:r160836], which agrees i686-linux results > on gcc100 at > (160820) and

[Bug tree-optimization/43924] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

2010-06-16 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-17 02:20 --- Disappeared for cris-elf in (160828:r160836], which agrees i686-linux results on gcc100 at (160820) and

[Bug tree-optimization/43924] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

2010-05-13 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-13 14:31 --- *** Bug 44114 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/43924] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

2010-05-13 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-13 14:31 --- Reopen. This bug report has more info than PR 44114. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/43924] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

2010-05-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #8 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-05-13 14:25 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 44114 *** -- dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/43924] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

2010-05-12 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-12 15:54 --- Also on i386-pc-solaris2.1[01] and sparc-sun-solaris2.1[01]. -- ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/43924] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

2010-04-29 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-29 20:40 --- Well, guess what, cris-elf too! Worked with 158780, failed with 158788 (and after) as in the description, except the line number I see for r158788 is 10648; I'm guessing the description is from 158793 or later. -- hp

[Bug tree-optimization/43924] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

2010-04-28 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-28 23:07 --- Comment propagated from the duplicate PR. It appears to be an in-lining issue. This reduced case program main implicit none call build (77) contains subroutine build (order) integer :: order, i, j ca

[Bug tree-optimization/43924] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

2010-04-28 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-04-28 22:01 --- It is caused by revision 158788: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-04/msg00895.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43924

[Bug tree-optimization/43924] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

2010-04-28 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-28 21:35 --- *** Bug 43928 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/43924] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

2010-04-28 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug tree-optimization/43924] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

2010-04-28 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-04-28 19:21 --- I did not filled the triplets since I see the ICE on *-darwin-* and *-linux-* as well. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43924

[Bug tree-optimization/43924] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

2010-04-28 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-28 19:08 --- The regression is also seen on i686-*-freebsd. The regression dissappears if r158788 is reverted. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --