http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44485
Jackie Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jackie.rosen at hushmail dot
com
--- Comm
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-26 16:48 ---
Should be fixed now.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-26 16:39 ---
Subject: Bug 44485
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Aug 26 16:39:26 2010
New Revision: 163568
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163568
Log:
PR tree-optimization/44485
* calls.c (flags_from_
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-25 17:26 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> The problem is that func_21 is first marked as
> TREE_READONLY/DECL_LOOPING_CONST_OR_PURE_P by local_pure_const, thus there are
> no vops on it, but afterwards it is by another local_pure_c
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-25 16:39 ---
The problem is that func_21 is first marked as
TREE_READONLY/DECL_LOOPING_CONST_OR_PURE_P by local_pure_const, thus there are
no vops on it, but afterwards it is by another local_pure_const made
also TREE_THIS_VOLATILE
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 12:01 ---
Probably related. Honza?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added