[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 --- Comment #17 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02 15:06:28 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Tue Nov 2 15:06:21 2010 New Revision: 166190 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166190 Log: 2010-11-02 Martin

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 --- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-21 13:06:20 UTC --- I have just posted a patch fixing the original issue reported in this bug to the mailing list: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01822.html

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 --- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-21 14:35:05 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Thu Oct 21 14:34:58 2010 New Revision: 165780 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165780 Log: 2010-10-21 Martin

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 --- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-15 12:15:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) Created attachment 22045 [details] reduced testcase from comment #1 Reduced from the original testcase Hm, this must a be a

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 --- Comment #11 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-10-14 22:49:12 UTC --- Created attachment 22045 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22045 reduced testcase from comment #1 Reduced from the original testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 --- Comment #8 from dcb dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2010-10-13 22:14:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) This testcase was reduced from testsuite/g++.dg/abi/covariant3.C, but is seems to be the same problem. So no one makes sure that the standard

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-13 22:16:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) So no one makes sure that the standard gcc/g++ testsuite compiles without valgrind errors at all times ? No what happens is that

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-03 19:59:11 UTC --- Btw, please don't strip CPP line notes from preprocessed source, that makes un-including impossible.

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 --- Comment #3 from dcb dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2010-10-03 20:22:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Btw, please don't strip CPP line notes from preprocessed source, that makes un-including impossible. Two questions 1. What is un-including,

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-03 20:39:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) Btw, please don't strip CPP line notes from preprocessed source, that makes un-including

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot