[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-01 Thread froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #8 from Nathan Froyd 2010-11-01 18:58:35 UTC --- Author: froydnj Date: Mon Nov 1 18:58:30 2010 New Revision: 166139 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166139 Log: gcc/ 2010-11-01 Nathan Froyd PR tree-optim

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-01 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-01 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-01 16:21:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > If I had to guess, one of these two hunks is probably responsible: > > > --- trunk/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c2010/10/31 01:58:12166101 > +++ trunk/gcc/tree-ve

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-01 Thread froydnj at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #5 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-01 14:57:32 UTC --- If I had to guess, one of these two hunks is probably responsible: --- trunk/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c2010/10/31 01:58:12166101 +++ trunk/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c2

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-01 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-01 14:50:25 UTC --- (gdb) f 3 #3 0x0076db8b in const_vector_from_tree (exp=0x703f5880) at ../../src/gcc/expr.c:10253 10253RTVEC_ELT (v, i) = immed_double_int_const (tree_to_double_int (

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-01 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-01 14:49:15 UTC --- (gdb) f 3 #3 0x0076db8b in const_vector_from_tree (exp=0x703f5880) at ../../src/gcc/expr.c:10253 10253RTVEC_ELT (v, i) = immed_double_int_const (tree_to_double_int (

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-01 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-01 14:48:00 UTC --- #0 internal_error (gmsgid=0x12a2830 "tree check: %s, have %s in %s, at %s:%d") at ../../src/gcc/diagnostic.c:825 #1 0x00ccb556 in tree_check_failed (node=0x71190f78, f

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-01 Thread froydnj at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #1 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-01 14:40:58 UTC --- A backtrace and/or a reduced testcase would be helpful. I don't have a copy of SPEC 2006.

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-01 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0