http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47355
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47355
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-21
15:15:42 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 21 15:15:40 2011
New Revision: 169094
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169094
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47355
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47355
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-20
10:45:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 23042
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23042
gcc46-pr47355.patch
Untested fix. Seems ehcleanup assumes nop is used just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47355
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-19
12:48:57 UTC ---
From what I have seen, it's pass_cleanup_eh removing an SSA
(names$_storage_94) name that is still being referenced in the IL (as
a parameter to zfree).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47355
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2011-01-19 13:27:34
UTC ---
Created attachment 23029
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23029
more reduced testcase
$ gcc -O -fipa-cp -fipa-cp-clone testcase.C
testcase.C:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47355
--- Comment #1 from Roman Kononov roman at binarylife dot net 2011-01-19
01:45:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 23026
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23026
this is the real test case; ignore the other one please
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47355
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last