http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #19 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-18
14:02:27 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 14:02:22 2011
New Revision: 172647
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172647
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.4.6 |4.4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #18 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-28
10:14:39 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 28 10:14:34 2011
New Revision: 171595
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171595
Log:
2011-03-28 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #16 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-03-15
08:44:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Created attachment 23614 [details]
patch
testing appreciated
Applied to gcc 4.6/4.5/4.4 then bootstrapped and regression
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #17 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-15
09:49:39 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 15 09:49:33 2011
New Revision: 170983
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170983
Log:
2011-03-15 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-03-10
09:22:04 UTC ---
If I revert this part of r139061 then things work again:
* gimplify.c (gimplify_conversion): Use maybe_fold_offset_to_address.
--- gcc/gimplify.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-03-10 09:33:49 UTC ---
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, mikpe at it dot uu.se wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-10
12:34:57 UTC ---
It's mixing VLA unaware foldings into the mids of GIMPLE which is the
root of the issue though. The issue is latent on trunk.
Patch for the first
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-03-10 12:36:33 UTC ---
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-10
12:46:33 UTC ---
No it isn't. But given that fold at this place doesn't even
fill in the array-ref element-size slot but provides NULL_TREE
it is probably a fix for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-03-10 12:57:59 UTC ---
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-10
13:04:17 UTC ---
That would work, too. You see no problem with a NULL operand 3
of array-refs? If you create an array with a variable lower bound,
take its address,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-03-10 13:07:16 UTC ---
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-10
13:10:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 23614
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23614
patch
testing appreciated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #15 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-03-10
14:03:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Created attachment 23614 [details]
patch
testing appreciated
Thanks, fixes the ICE in 4.5 and 4.4 crosses to m68k-linux. I'm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-03-09 09:21:46 UTC ---
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, mikpe at it dot uu.se wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-03-09
23:36:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, mikpe at it dot uu.se wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
Mikael Pettersson mikpe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.0, 4.4.1,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc
22 matches
Mail list logo