[Bug tree-optimization/49642] constant part of a macro not optimized away as expected due to splitter

2012-01-18 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642 --- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-18 19:28:23 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Jan 18 19:28:19 2012 New Revision: 183284 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183284 Log: gcc: 2012-01-11

[Bug tree-optimization/49642] constant part of a macro not optimized away as expected due to splitter

2012-01-18 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642 William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED

[Bug tree-optimization/49642] constant part of a macro not optimized away as expected due to splitter

2012-01-18 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/49642] constant part of a macro not optimized away as expected due to splitter

2012-01-11 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642 --- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-11 16:52:13 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Jan 11 16:52:03 2012 New Revision: 183101 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183101 Log: gcc: 2012-01-11

[Bug tree-optimization/49642] constant part of a macro not optimized away as expected due to splitter

2012-01-11 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642 --- Comment #9 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-11 22:37:33 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Jan 11 22:37:26 2012 New Revision: 183110 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183110 Log: gcc: 2012-01-11

[Bug tree-optimization/49642] constant part of a macro not optimized away as expected due to splitter

2012-01-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/49642] constant part of a macro not optimized away as expected due to splitter

2012-01-09 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642 --- Comment #7 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-09 21:57:57 UTC --- I should note that the problem still persists in 4.7 when -fno-tree-fre is specified. For 4.6, I am working on a solution along the lines Richi

[Bug tree-optimization/49642] constant part of a macro not optimized away as expected due to splitter

2012-01-06 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642 William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt

[Bug tree-optimization/49642] constant part of a macro not optimized away as expected due to splitter

2012-01-06 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642 --- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-07 00:13:10 UTC --- This was solved (or became dormant) with revision 171450 on trunk: 2011-03-25 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de * passes.c

[Bug tree-optimization/49642] constant part of a macro not optimized away as expected due to splitter

2011-07-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last