http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963
--- Comment #12 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-18 11:30:50 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Aug 18 11:30:42 2011
New Revision: 177848
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177848
Log:
2011-08-18 Paolo Carlini
Jos
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2011-08-17
17:22:16 UTC ---
Ok, thanks, will do later today.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-08-17 11:25:02 UTC ---
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963
>
> Paolo Carlini changed:
>
>What|Remov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #9 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-08-10
09:45:12 UTC ---
Is this related to PR42146, an ICE on array size of 0x8000?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-08-08
08:28:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 24909 [details]
> Draft patch
>
> I'm attaching a patch which tries to implement what Joseph suggests (thanks!).
> Essentially, I'm re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-08-03
20:29:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 24909
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24909
Draft patch
I'm attaching a patch which tries to implement what Joseph suggests (thanks!).
Essential
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-08-03 18:59:33 UTC ---
I think this is a case for a function absu_hwi or similar that returns an
unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT value.
(Actually it's a case for operating properly on the INTEGER_CS
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-08-03
15:45:06 UTC ---
Eh, my way of fixing it would be removing the assert ;) Seriously, too bad, I
can try to look a bit into it but help is welcome of course, I don't think the
project wants to rely on my
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-03
15:27:36 UTC ---
Probably fails on any 32bit HWI platform.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
13 matches
Mail list logo