http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50730
--- Comment #6 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04 12:55:11 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Fri Nov 4 12:55:06 2011
New Revision: 180945
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180945
Log:
Unrevert:
2011-10-24 Ira R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50730
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50730
--- Comment #4 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-24 09:16:57 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Mon Oct 24 09:16:53 2011
New Revision: 180367
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180367
Log:
PR tree-optimization/50730
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50730
--- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen 2011-10-22 12:09:30 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> First blush, looks like something could be abstracted as a function or a
> macro?!?
Hmm, I don't know. There is a 'continue' there...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50730
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-16
12:23:43 UTC ---
First blush, looks like something could be abstracted as a function or a
macro?!?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50730
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
