[Bug tree-optimization/51254] Missed Optimization: IVOPTS don't handle unaligned memory access.

2011-12-14 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-12-14 09:38:51 UTC --- On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, duyuehai at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254 > > --- Comment #5 from Yuehai Du 2011-12-14 02:29:07 > UTC ---

[Bug tree-optimization/51254] Missed Optimization: IVOPTS don't handle unaligned memory access.

2011-12-13 Thread duyuehai at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254 --- Comment #5 from Yuehai Du 2011-12-14 02:29:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, duyuehai at gmail dot com wrote: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254 > > > > Yuehai Du changed: > > > >W

[Bug tree-optimization/51254] Missed Optimization: IVOPTS don't handle unaligned memory access.

2011-12-13 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-12-13 10:27:48 UTC --- On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, duyuehai at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254 > > Yuehai Du changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/51254] Missed Optimization: IVOPTS don't handle unaligned memory access.

2011-12-12 Thread duyuehai at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254 --- Comment #3 from Yuehai Du 2011-12-13 04:16:22 UTC --- Hi Richard would it be ok if i submit a patch like this to fix this bug: Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c === --- gcc/tr

[Bug tree-optimization/51254] Missed Optimization: IVOPTS don't handle unaligned memory access.

2011-12-12 Thread duyuehai at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254 Yuehai Du changed: What|Removed |Added CC||duyuehai at gmail dot com,

[Bug tree-optimization/51254] Missed Optimization: IVOPTS don't handle unaligned memory access.

2011-11-20 Thread duyuehai at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254 --- Comment #1 from Yuehai Du 2011-11-21 04:23:44 UTC --- Created attachment 25870 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25870 testcase