[Bug tree-optimization/51315] gcc 4.6.2 miscompilation with -ftree-sra (included in -O2) on Debian/sparc

2011-12-03 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51315 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/51315] gcc 4.6.2 miscompilation with -ftree-sra (included in -O2) on Debian/sparc

2011-12-01 Thread jurij at wooyd dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51315 --- Comment #4 from Jurij Smakov jurij at wooyd dot org 2011-12-01 09:26:54 UTC --- So, how do we convince someone to fix it? As Mikael points out, the same or very similar problem has already been reported multiple times, and it appears that

[Bug tree-optimization/51315] gcc 4.6.2 miscompilation with -ftree-sra (included in -O2) on Debian/sparc

2011-11-29 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51315 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug tree-optimization/51315] gcc 4.6.2 miscompilation with -ftree-sra (included in -O2) on Debian/sparc

2011-11-29 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51315 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-11-29 10:18:00 UTC --- I suspect it's a dupe of PR50569 or PR50444. (And if you hate alignment bugs like me you might also want to know about the 4.5-only PR46483.)

[Bug tree-optimization/51315] gcc 4.6.2 miscompilation with -ftree-sra (included in -O2) on Debian/sparc

2011-11-28 Thread jurij at wooyd dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51315 --- Comment #1 from Jurij Smakov jurij at wooyd dot org 2011-11-28 23:45:19 UTC --- Debian gcc maintainers suggested that I try to build the test case with various gcc versions available in Debian and post the results here. Here's a summary: