https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
--- Comment #14 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-10
16:06:20 UTC ---
I'd disagree with that. I suspect 99% of them are not overridden, just like
99% of C functions are not weak and not overridden either. As for what should
be done, doesn't m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-10
11:28:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Ah, I had another thought. COMDAT and LINKONCE things I don't think can be
> realigned for all the same reasons that one cannot align COMMON. I've not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-03-20 15:56:55 UTC ---
> PR52603. Could you test the patch?
Sorry, pr52614.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-03-20
15:55:23 UTC ---
> Unfortunately, the patch caused many testsuite failures on both
> sparc-sun-solaris
> and powerpc-apple-darwin, as can be seen e.g. at
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-16
16:48:38 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Mar 16 16:48:31 2012
New Revision: 185474
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185474
Log:
2012-03-16 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-14
13:00:49 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 14 13:00:44 2012
New Revision: 185380
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185380
Log:
2012-03-14 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-03-14 09:35:12 UTC ---
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, ian at airs dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
>
> --- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-03-13
> 15:48:36 UTC --
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-03-13 15:48:36
UTC ---
I agree: if the symbol is always common, the linker should use the largest
alignment. But the symbol need not always be common. Consider one file with
"unsigned long int *p;" and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-12
22:10:16 UTC ---
Dup of either PR 48127 or PR 49379.
16 matches
Mail list logo
