http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631
--- Comment #12 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-03-04
11:12:42 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Mar 4 11:12:30 2013
New Revision: 196428
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196428
Log:
PR testsuite/52641
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law 2013-01-20
05:01:04 UTC ---
Author: law
Date: Sun Jan 20 05:00:56 2013
New Revision: 195318
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195318
Log:
PR tree-optimization/52631
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.2 |4.7.3
--- Comment #9 from Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-24
03:21:29 UTC ---
Here is the simpler patch:
Index: tree-ssa-sccvn.c
===
--- tree-ssa-sccvn.c(revision 185559)
+++ tree-ssa-sccvn.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-24
03:10:37 UTC ---
Ok, I have a patch which only tries to looking up the simplified expression and
then if we find it, use it, otherwise use the original expression. I now
understand why this makes a di
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-21
00:14:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hmm, but then you'd pessimize the case where b_2 & 1 were available? Thus,
> don't you need to do the lookup with the original expression anyway if the
> lo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-20
11:13:57 UTC ---
Hmm, but then you'd pessimize the case where b_2 & 1 were available? Thus,
don't you need to do the lookup with the original expression anyway if the
lookup for the simplified expr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-20
06:57:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 26927
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26927
Patch which fixes the problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
12 matches
Mail list logo